
On this page you can learn about abrasive wear and how to reduce it.
|
Abrasion is the most common form of wear in industry. It is defined as:
'The action of a hard, sharp material cutting through the surface of a softer material'
The abrasive may be products like coal, cement, rock, glass, ceramics or ore. It may be being processed; that is mined, crushed, extruded or conveyed. The consequent wear of machinery and parts is called:
'High Stress, Two-Body Abrasion'
and requires hard, tough and thick surface coatings to combat it.
The abrasive may be present as a contaminant in a product, for instance sand in oil being pumped ashore. Facilities like pumps and valves will have abrasive trapped between rubbing surfaces (for instance bearings), with crushing of the particles to cause sharp abrasive edges. This is called:
'Three-Body Abrasion'
and, since high stresses are involved, requires hard, tough surfaces.
Finally, the abrasive may be present within the product, either as a filler or a pigment. For instance, glass fibres in plastics, pigments like titania in textiles or chrome oxide in ink (printing, paper handling), cellulose in wood or grain, abrasive elements in medical, tobacco or food products, etc. Components handling such products suffer what
'Low Stress Abrasive Wear'
and can usually be combated with hard, relatively thin coatings.
Abrasive wear tests can provide only RELATIVE performance rankings. The actual wear rate that might be found in a practical application will depend on many factors, not least load, particle hardness, particle density, particle shape and size, as well as temperature and the environment.
In the case of High Stress Abrasive Wear, the hardness of the coating or surface being abraded is not always the crucial factor; the thickness (or case-depth) of the layer, its toughness and load carrying capacity, and the support provided by the substrate are all important factors.
| Low Wear Rate (best) | Thermally Sprayed WC/Co |
| CVD CrC | |
| CVD CrN | |
| Salt Bath Carbide Diffusion Coating | |
| Thick PVD Ceramic Coating | |
| Hard Chrome Plate | |
| Sprayed and HIPPED CrC/Ni/Cr | |
| Plasma Sprayed Alumina | |
| Electroless Nickel/SiC | |
| Boronised Stainless Steel | |
| Plasma Sprayed Chromium Oxide | |
| Spray Fused Ni/Cr/CrC | |
| Carburised Steel | |
| Induction Hardened Steel | |
| Thermochemically Formed Ceramic | |
| Nitrided 316 Stainless Steel | |
| Hardened Electroless Nickel | |
| As-Plated Electroless Nickel | |
| Thin PVD Ceramic | |
| High Wear Rate (worst) | Anodised Aluminium Alloy |
Abrasive wear tests can provide only RELATIVE performance rankings. The actual wear rate that might be found in a practical application will depend on many factors, not least load, particle hardness, particle density, particle shape and size, as well as temperature and the environment.
In the case of Low Stress Abrasive Wear, the hardness of the coating or surface being abraded is often the crucial factor, so that when the loads are light even very thin coatings can provide wear protection.
| Low Wear Rate (best) | Thermally Sprayed WC/Co |
| Plasma Sprayed Chromium Oxide | |
| Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation | |
| Plasma Sprayed Alumina | |
| CVD CrN | |
| CVD CrC | |
| Nitrided 316 Stainless Steel | |
| Thin PVD Ceramic | |
| Thermochemically Formed Ceramic | |
| Hard Chrome Plate | |
| Carburised Steel | |
| Electroless Nickel/SiC | |
| Anodised Aluminium Alloy | |
| Hardened Electroless Nickel | |
| As-Plated Electroless Nickel | |
| Austenitic Stainless Steel | |
| High Wear Rate (worst) | Aluminium Alloy |
Low stress abrasion can be combated by relatively thin, hard coatings, The criterion for selection is that the coating hardness should be at least 20% higher than the hardness of the abrasive that is causing the problem. You should consult the coating supplier for guidance in this area. Some options are:
High stress abrasion cannot be solved by simply increasing the surface hardness. The coating must be tough and be able to withstand large crushing forces. It must be self-supportive and be backed by a resilient substrate. The best coatings are:
Poeton & Apticote
supporting global manufacturing, from A to Z
APTICOTE 100 – Hard Chrome
APTICOTE 200 – Polymer Composite
APTICOTE 300 – Hard Anodising
APTICOTE 400 – Electroless Nickel
APTICOTE 600 - Silver
APTICOTE 800 – Plasma / Thermal Spray Coatings
APTICOTE 3000 – Keronite
APTICOTE 900 – Cadmium
APTICOTE 300SP – Sulphuric Anodising / PTFE Composite
APTICOTE 350 – Hard Anodic / PTFE Composites
APTICOTE 355 - Hard Anodising / Polymer (15,000 hrs corrosion protection)
APTICOTE 450 – Electroless Nickel / PTFE Composite (Co deposition)
APTICOTE 460 – Electroless Nickel / Polymer Composites
APTICOTE 810 – Plasma / Thermal Spray / Polymer Composite
APTICOTE 2000 – Nickel / Silicon Carbide Composite Coating.
Contracted R&D
Failure Analysis Projects and Coating Characterisation